IVV vs RACK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF
Which is better, IVV or RACK?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, RACK over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RACK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 51 |
| YTD Return | +12.27%Best | -10.48% |
| 1Y Return | +17.04%Best | -10.48% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6%Best | 229121403.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | - |
| $10,000 over 12.6 years | $44,755 | $95,571Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 44.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 1, 2026 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 12.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 18, 2014 to Sep 17, 2026 (12.6 years).
IVV vs RACK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RACK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while RACK returned -10.48%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a loss of 10.48% for RACK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RACK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 229121403.5% compared with 14.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.08. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RACK charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for RACK.
Holdings Overlap
18.0% of IVV's money is in holdings RACK also owns. 75.6% of RACK's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of RACK is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
32 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in RACK, against full books of 508 and 51.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 13 positions for RACK that do not appear in our book for IVV (15.8% of the fund), and 450 for IVV that do not appear in RACK (80.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RACK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 4.96% | 3.11% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 4.55% | 1.90% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 4.79% | 3.16% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 0.13% | 5.30% | 5.17% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.29% | 5.01% | 4.72% |
| PEGPublic Svc Ent Group | 0.06% | 4.06% | 4.00% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 0.30% | 3.58% | 3.28% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 2.65% | 1.49% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.35% | 3.45% | 3.10% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 0.38% | 3.21% | 2.83% |
75.6% of RACK is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RACK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RACK charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RACK?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs -10.48% for RACK, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IVV annualized +12.63% vs +19.62% for RACK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RACK?
RACK has been the more volatile fund at 229121403.5% annualized versus 14.6% for IVV.
Should I hold both IVV and RACK?
IVV and RACK have a monthly-return correlation of -0.08, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RACK?
75.6% of RACK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 75.6% of RACK's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in RACK.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RACK?
IVV yields 1.06% while RACK yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RACK better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, RACK over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.