IVV vs RACK
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RACK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $54M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 52 | |
| YTD Return | +12.76% | -9.97% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.63% | -9.97% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.71% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.87% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 230991813.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -100.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 1, 2026 |
IVV vs RACK Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) is a ETF from VanEck. Over the past year IVV returned +20.63% while RACK returned -9.97%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.76% versus a loss of 9.97% for RACK.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RACK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 230991813.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -100.0% for RACK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.08. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RACK charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for RACK.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RACK share 32 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RACK?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RACK charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RACK?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.63% vs -9.97% for RACK, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IVV annualized +6.99% vs +19.78% for RACK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RACK?
RACK has been the more volatile fund at 230991813.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RACK -100.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and RACK?
IVV and RACK have a monthly-return correlation of -0.08, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RACK?
IVV and RACK share 32 common holdings with a 15.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RACK?
IVV yields 1.10% while RACK yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.