IVV vs RDVY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. RDVY delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RDVY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.47% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $24.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.93% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 74 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +19.04% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +31.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +21.38% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | +13.07% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -40.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 6, 2014 |
IVV vs RDVY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while RDVY returned +31.24%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 19.04% for RDVY.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +21.38% for RDVY; over five years the annualized figures are +13.39% and +13.07% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, RDVY has the edge at +12.73% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RDVY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -40.6% for RDVY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RDVY charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $47 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.93% for RDVY.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RDVY share 63 holdings out of 513 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RDVY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RDVY charges 0.47%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RDVY?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +31.24% for RDVY, so RDVY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +12.73% for RDVY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RDVY?
RDVY has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RDVY -40.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and RDVY?
IVV and RDVY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RDVY?
IVV and RDVY share 63 common holdings with a 22.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 513 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RDVY?
IVV yields 1.09% while RDVY yields 0.93%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.