IVV vs RNTY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs YieldMax Target 12 Real Estate Option Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or RNTY?
Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RNTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.99% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 12.34% |
| Holdings | 508 | 75 |
| YTD Return | +12.01%Best | +3.95% |
| 1Y Return | +16.48%Best | +4.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.21% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2% | 10.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9% | -7.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $14,639Best | $10,791 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 53.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 16, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 17, 2025 to Sep 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
IVV vs RNTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RNTY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and YieldMax Target 12 Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% while RNTY returned +4.45%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.01% versus a gain of 3.95% for RNTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 10.3% for RNTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -7.9% for RNTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RNTY charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $99 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 12.34% for RNTY.
Holdings Overlap
1.5% of IVV's money is in holdings RNTY also owns. 84.7% of RNTY's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of RNTY is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 26 in RNTY, against full books of 508 and 75.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for RNTY that do not appear in our book for IVV (15.3% of the fund), and 462 for IVV that do not appear in RNTY (97.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RNTY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 0.25% | 7.42% | 7.17% |
| EQRVivmark Residential | 0.07% | 6.96% | 6.89% |
| PLDPrologis Inc | 0.20% | 6.62% | 6.42% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 0.10% | 5.80% | 5.70% |
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 0.10% | 5.21% | 5.11% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 0.16% | 4.79% | 4.63% |
| TPLTexas Pacific Land Trust | 0.03% | 4.22% | 4.19% |
| ORealty Income Corp. | 0.09% | 3.97% | 3.88% |
| IRMIron Mtn Inc New Com Npv | 0.05% | 3.90% | 3.85% |
| PSAPublic Storage | 0.08% | 3.83% | 3.75% |
84.7% of RNTY is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RNTY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RNTY charges 0.99%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RNTY?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% vs +4.45% for RNTY, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +31.29% vs +5.59% for RNTY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RNTY?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 10.3% for RNTY. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs RNTY -7.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and RNTY?
IVV and RNTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RNTY?
84.7% of RNTY's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 84.7% of RNTY's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 26 in RNTY.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RNTY?
IVV yields 1.06% while RNTY yields 12.34%, so RNTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RNTY better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.