IVV vs RNTY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs YieldMax Target 12 Real Estate Option Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RNTY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.99% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 12.07% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +9.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +11.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 9.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -7.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | YieldMax ETF | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 16, 2025 |
IVV vs RNTY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and YieldMax Target 12 Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while RNTY returned +11.69%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 9.33% for RNTY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.9% for RNTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -7.9% for RNTY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RNTY charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $99 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 12.07% for RNTY.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RNTY share 21 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RNTY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RNTY charges 0.99%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RNTY?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +11.69% for RNTY, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +9.92% for RNTY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RNTY?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.9% for RNTY. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RNTY -7.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and RNTY?
IVV and RNTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RNTY?
IVV and RNTY share 21 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RNTY?
IVV yields 1.10% while RNTY yields 12.07%, so RNTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.