IVV vs RNTY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs YieldMax Target 12 Real Estate Option Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or RNTY?
Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RNTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.99% |
| AUM | $850.0B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 12.55% |
| Holdings | 1,018 | 142 |
| YTD Return | +12.12%Best | +7.89% |
| 1Y Return | +12.53%Best | +6.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.93% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7% | 10.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9% | -7.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $14,808Best | $11,232 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 16, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 17, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.6 years).
IVV vs RNTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RNTY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and YieldMax Target 12 Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year IVV returned +12.53% while RNTY returned +6.72%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.12% versus a gain of 7.89% for RNTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.7% compared with 10.5% for RNTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -7.9% for RNTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RNTY charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $99 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 12.55% for RNTY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and RNTY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RNTY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RNTY charges 0.99%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RNTY?
Over the past year IVV returned +12.53% vs +6.72% for RNTY, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +27.81% vs +7.53% for RNTY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RNTY?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.7% annualized versus 10.5% for RNTY. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs RNTY -7.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and RNTY?
IVV and RNTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RNTY?
IVV yields 1.09% while RNTY yields 12.55%, so RNTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RNTY better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.