IVV vs ROPE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Coastal Compass 100 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ROPE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.81% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $10M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.89% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 54 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +11.98% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +21.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -14.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Coastal Compass Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 17, 2024 |
IVV vs ROPE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Coastal Compass 100 ETF (ROPE) is a ETF from Coastal Compass Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while ROPE returned +21.82%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 11.98% for ROPE.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.3% for ROPE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -14.3% for ROPE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ROPE charges 0.81%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $81 annually, a gap of $78 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.89% for ROPE.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and ROPE share 51 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ROPE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ROPE charges 0.81%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $78 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or ROPE?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +21.82% for ROPE, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +16.77% for ROPE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or ROPE?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.3% for ROPE. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs ROPE -14.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and ROPE?
IVV and ROPE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ROPE?
IVV and ROPE share 51 common holdings with a 16.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ROPE?
IVV yields 1.09% while ROPE yields 1.89%, so ROPE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.