IVV vs ROPE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Coastal Compass 100 ETF
Which is better, IVV or ROPE?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ROPE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.81% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $24M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.87% |
| Holdings | 508 | 52 |
| YTD Return | +13.39%Best | +11.55% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +17.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6% | 11.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -14.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $13,393Best | $12,836 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 49.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Coastal Compass Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (1.7 years).
IVV vs ROPE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs ROPE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Coastal Compass 100 ETF (ROPE) is an ETF from Coastal Compass Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while ROPE returned +17.47%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 11.55% for ROPE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 11.1% for ROPE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -14.3% for ROPE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ROPE charges 0.81%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $81 annually, a gap of $78 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.87% for ROPE.
Holdings Overlap
29.4% of IVV's money is in holdings ROPE also owns. 96.8% of ROPE's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of ROPE is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
49 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in ROPE, against full books of 508 and 52.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for ROPE that do not appear in our book for IVV (2.0% of the fund), and 448 for IVV that do not appear in ROPE (70.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in ROPE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.86% | 1.19% | 5.67% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.33% | 5.48% | 5.15% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 0.44% | 4.97% | 4.53% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.65% | 4.75% | 4.10% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.51% | 4.88% | 4.37% |
| USBUS Bancorp | 0.15% | 5.20% | 5.05% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 0.12% | 5.23% | 5.11% |
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 0.11% | 4.93% | 4.82% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 0.16% | 4.75% | 4.59% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 0.12% | 4.69% | 4.57% |
96.8% of ROPE is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ROPE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ROPE charges 0.81%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $78 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or ROPE?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +17.47% for ROPE, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +18.75% vs +15.82% for ROPE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or ROPE?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 11.1% for ROPE. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs ROPE -14.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and ROPE?
IVV and ROPE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ROPE?
96.8% of ROPE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 96.8% of ROPE's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in ROPE.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ROPE?
IVV yields 1.10% while ROPE yields 1.87%, so ROPE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ROPE better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.