IVV vs SIXG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Defiance Connective Technologies ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SIXG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SIXG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.30% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $706M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.53% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 52 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +25.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +93.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 22.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -28.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Defiance ETFs, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 4, 2019 |
IVV vs SIXG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (SIXG) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while SIXG returned +93.92%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 25.67% for SIXG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SIXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -28.1% for SIXG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SIXG charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $30 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.53% for SIXG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SIXG share 21 holdings out of 535 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SIXG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SIXG charges 0.30%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SIXG?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +93.92% for SIXG, so SIXG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +42.02% for SIXG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SIXG?
SIXG has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SIXG -28.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and SIXG?
IVV and SIXG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SIXG?
IVV and SIXG share 21 common holdings with a 16.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 535 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SIXG?
IVV yields 1.09% while SIXG yields 0.53%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.