IVV vs SRHR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs SRH REIT Covered Call ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SRHR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $55M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 6.35% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 34 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +17.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -18.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | SRH Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 1, 2023 |
IVV vs SRHR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and SRH REIT Covered Call ETF (SRHR) is a ETF from SRH Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while SRHR returned +17.58%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 14.29% for SRHR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.0% for SRHR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -18.7% for SRHR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SRHR charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 6.35% for SRHR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SRHR share 8 holdings out of 522 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SRHR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SRHR charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SRHR?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +17.58% for SRHR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +11.79% for SRHR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SRHR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.0% for SRHR. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SRHR -18.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and SRHR?
IVV and SRHR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SRHR?
IVV and SRHR share 8 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 522 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SRHR?
IVV yields 1.09% while SRHR yields 6.35%, so SRHR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.