SUPP vs VYM
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SUPP or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SUPP | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 30 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +11.46% | +14.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.39% | +20.01%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.04% | +18.43%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 11.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.3% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $16,088 | $16,560Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.2% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 14, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 16, 2023 to Sep 8, 2026 (3.6 years).
SUPP vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.
SUPP vs VYM Performance
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) is an ETF from TCW ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SUPP returned +14.39% while VYM returned +20.01%. Year to date, SUPP is up 11.46% versus a gain of 14.33% for VYM.
Over three years, SUPP compounded at +16.04% per year against +18.43% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +15.04% annualized vs +14.12%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SUPP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 11.1% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.3% for SUPP and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SUPP charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SUPP currently yields 0.32% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
12.4% of SUPP's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.2% of VYM's money is in holdings SUPP also owns.
SUPP and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, SUPP as of Aug 17, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
4 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in SUPP and 602 in VYM, against full books of 30 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 565 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SUPP (87.1% of the fund), and 16 for SUPP that do not appear in VYM (62.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SUPP and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SUPP or VYM?
SUPP has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SUPP or VYM?
Over the past year SUPP returned +14.39% vs +20.01% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SUPP annualized +14.12% vs +15.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SUPP or VYM?
SUPP has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 11.1% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SUPP -25.3% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both SUPP and VYM?
SUPP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SUPP and VYM?
12.4% of SUPP's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.2% of VYM's is in holdings SUPP also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in SUPP and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, SUPP or VYM?
SUPP yields 0.32% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SUPP?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.