IVV vs THNR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. THNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | THNR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $5M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.63% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 22 | |
| YTD Return | +13.22% | +8.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.62% | +22.72% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.17% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.42% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -33.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Amplify ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 21, 2024 |
IVV vs THNR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF (THNR) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% while THNR returned +22.72%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.22% versus a gain of 8.30% for THNR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
THNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -33.1% for THNR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while THNR charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.63% for THNR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and THNR share 6 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or THNR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while THNR charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or THNR?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% vs +22.72% for THNR, so THNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +4.40% for THNR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or THNR?
THNR has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs THNR -33.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and THNR?
IVV and THNR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and THNR?
IVV and THNR share 6 common holdings with a 3.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or THNR?
IVV yields 1.10% while THNR yields 1.63%, so THNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.