IVV vs VCLT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard Long Term Corporate Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VCLT offers more diversification with 2436 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VCLT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $9.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 5.49% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 2,601 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -2.06% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -0.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +5.02% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | -2.77% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -35.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 19, 2009 |
IVV vs VCLT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while VCLT returned -0.62%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 2.06% for VCLT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +5.02% for VCLT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and -2.77% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +1.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.7% for VCLT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -35.1% for VCLT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VCLT charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 5.49% for VCLT.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VCLT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VCLT charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or VCLT?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -0.62% for VCLT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +1.43% for VCLT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or VCLT?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.7% for VCLT. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs VCLT -35.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and VCLT?
IVV and VCLT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VCLT?
IVV and VCLT share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2939 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VCLT?
IVV yields 1.09% while VCLT yields 5.49%, so VCLT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.