IVV vs WOMN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Impact Shares Women's Empowerment ETF
Which is better, IVV or WOMN?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. WOMN is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WOMN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $59M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.79% |
| Holdings | 508 | 204 |
| YTD Return | +12.51%Best | +9.08% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +11.71% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27%Best | +14.20% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95%Best | +8.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 16.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -32.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,384Best | $15,379 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 33.0%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Impact shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 24, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2018 to Sep 11, 2026 (8 years).
IVV vs WOMN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs WOMN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Impact Shares Women's Empowerment ETF (WOMN) is an ETF from Impact shares. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while WOMN returned +11.71%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 9.08% for WOMN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.27% per year against +14.20% for WOMN; over five years the annualized figures are +12.95% and +8.99% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.87% annualized vs +12.68%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 16.6% for WOMN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -32.2% for WOMN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WOMN charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.79% for WOMN.
Holdings Overlap
46.5% of IVV's money is in holdings WOMN also owns. 96.4% of WOMN's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of WOMN is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
180 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 200 in WOMN, against full books of 508 and 204.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 17 positions for WOMN that do not appear in our book for IVV (3.2% of the fund), and 315 for IVV that do not appear in WOMN (52.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in WOMN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 4.52% | 3.46% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.44% | 5.53% | 0.09% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.19% | 4.42% | 1.23% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.45% | 3.42% | 1.97% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.72% | 3.34% | 2.62% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.94% | 2.48% | 1.54% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 0.29% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
| VVisa Inc | 0.92% | 2.33% | 1.41% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.56% | 0.05% | 2.51% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc | 0.38% | 2.02% | 1.64% |
96.4% of WOMN is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WOMN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WOMN charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or WOMN?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +11.71% for WOMN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +13.87% vs +12.68% for WOMN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or WOMN?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 16.6% for WOMN. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs WOMN -32.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and WOMN?
IVV and WOMN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WOMN?
96.4% of WOMN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 96.4% of WOMN's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 180 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 200 in WOMN.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WOMN?
IVV yields 1.06% while WOMN yields 0.79%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WOMN better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. WOMN is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.