VYM vs WOMN
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Impact Shares Women's Empowerment ETF
Which is better, VYM or WOMN?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, WOMN over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | WOMN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $81.6B | $59M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.22% | 0.79% |
| Holdings | 613 | 204 |
| YTD Return | +13.15%Best | +7.90% |
| 1Y Return | +17.82%Best | +11.79% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.99%Best | +13.68% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.16%Best | +8.79% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 16.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -32.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,750Best | $15,239 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.9%Best | 33.0% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Impact shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Aug 24, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2018 to Sep 10, 2026 (8 years).
VYM vs WOMN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
VYM vs WOMN Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Impact Shares Women's Empowerment ETF (WOMN) is an ETF from Impact shares. Over the past year VYM returned +17.82% while WOMN returned +11.79%. Year to date, VYM is up 13.15% versus a gain of 7.90% for WOMN.
Over three years, VYM compounded at +17.99% per year against +13.68% for WOMN; over five years the annualized figures are +12.16% and +8.79% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, WOMN has the edge at +12.54% annualized vs +10.07%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WOMN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for VYM and -32.2% for WOMN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while WOMN charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $75 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.22% against 0.79% for WOMN.
Holdings Overlap
48.9% of VYM's money is in holdings WOMN also owns. 55.7% of WOMN's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 52 days apart, VYM as of Jun 30, 2026 and WOMN as of Aug 21, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
112 positions in common, counted across the 603 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 200 in WOMN, against full books of 613 and 204.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 85 positions for WOMN that do not appear in our book for VYM (43.8% of the fund), and 456 for VYM that do not appear in WOMN (48.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VYM | Weight in WOMN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 3.38% | 3.42% | 0.04% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.93% | 3.34% | 1.41% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.36% | 2.48% | 0.12% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 0.74% | 3.08% | 2.34% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.85% | 1.69% | 0.16% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc | 1.13% | 2.02% | 0.89% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 1.56% | 1.48% | 0.08% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 1.10% | 1.84% | 0.74% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group, Inc. | 1.56% | 1.22% | 0.34% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 1.46% | 1.28% | 0.18% |
55.7% of WOMN is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or WOMN?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while WOMN charges 0.75%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VYM or WOMN?
Over the past year VYM returned +17.82% vs +11.79% for WOMN, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), VYM annualized +10.07% vs +12.54% for WOMN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VYM or WOMN?
WOMN has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: VYM -35.7% vs WOMN -32.2%.
Should I hold both VYM and WOMN?
VYM and WOMN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and WOMN?
55.7% of WOMN's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 55.7% of WOMN's is in holdings VYM also owns. They hold 112 positions in common, counted across the 603 positions we hold weights for in VYM and 200 in WOMN.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or WOMN?
VYM yields 2.22% while WOMN yields 0.79%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WOMN better than VYM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, WOMN over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.