IVV vs WTID
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
Which is better, IVV or WTID?
Large Cap Blend against Energy.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 91.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WTID |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +13.14%Best | -81.70% |
| 1Y Return | +15.50%Best | -84.38% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.69%Best | -52.90% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.78% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3%Best | 56.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -94.9% |
| $10,000 over 3.7 years | $19,566Best | $723 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 91.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | UBS AG |
| Category | Equity | Commodity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Energy |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 4, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 15, 2023 to Oct 19, 2026 (3.7 years).
IVV vs WTID growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs WTID Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) is an ETF from UBS AG. Over the past year IVV returned +15.50% while WTID returned -84.38%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.14% versus a loss of 81.70% for WTID.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.69% per year against -52.90% for WTID. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +19.89% annualized vs -50.84%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WTID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 56.7% compared with 12.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -94.9% for WTID. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.00. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WTID charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for WTID.
Holdings Overlap
2.8% of IVV's money is in holdings WTID also owns. 100.0% of WTID's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of WTID is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
12 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 12 in WTID, against full books of 508 and 12.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 506 and 12 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 488 positions WTID does not, 96.7% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, AAPL 7.29%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 3.68%, GOOGL 3.00%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in WTID | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 1.02% | 15.59% | 14.57% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.62% | 15.27% | 14.65% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.23% | 10.42% | 10.19% |
| VLOValero Energy | 0.18% | 10.14% | 9.96% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 0.18% | 8.79% | 8.61% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 0.08% | 6.83% | 6.75% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 0.16% | 6.67% | 6.51% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 0.06% | 6.16% | 6.10% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.11% | 5.84% | 5.73% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc - Common | 0.06% | 5.41% | 5.35% |
100.0% of WTID is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WTID?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WTID charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or WTID?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.50% vs -84.38% for WTID, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +19.89% vs -50.84% for WTID. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or WTID?
WTID has been the more volatile fund at 56.7% annualized versus 12.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs WTID -94.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and WTID?
IVV and WTID have a monthly-return correlation of 0.00, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WTID?
100.0% of WTID's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 100.0% of WTID's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 12 in WTID.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WTID?
IVV yields 1.10% while WTID yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WTID better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 91.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.