IVV vs XAIX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. XAIX delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XAIX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $160M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.39% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 94 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +33.90% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +47.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 26.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -23.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Xtrackers ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 4, 2024 |
IVV vs XAIX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while XAIX returned +47.69%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 33.90% for XAIX.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XAIX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.9% for XAIX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XAIX charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.39% for XAIX.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and XAIX share 35 holdings out of 573 unique holdings combined, representing a 34.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XAIX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XAIX charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or XAIX?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +47.69% for XAIX, so XAIX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +41.02% for XAIX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or XAIX?
XAIX has been the more volatile fund at 26.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XAIX -23.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and XAIX?
IVV and XAIX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XAIX?
IVV and XAIX share 35 common holdings with a 34.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 573 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XAIX?
IVV yields 1.09% while XAIX yields 0.39%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.