IVW vs VTI
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IVW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $78.0B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 152 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.76% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.23% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.41% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.13% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 22, 2000 | May 24, 2001 |
IVW vs VTI Performance
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVW returned +23.23% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, IVW is up 12.76% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, IVW compounded at +26.41% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.13% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.1% for IVW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVW charges 0.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVW currently yields 0.37% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IVW and VTI share 139 holdings out of 2797 unique holdings combined, representing a 57.8% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVW or VTI?
IVW has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVW or VTI?
Over the past year IVW returned +23.23% vs +22.35% for VTI, so IVW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IVW annualized +7.76% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVW or VTI?
IVW has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IVW -72.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IVW and VTI?
IVW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVW and VTI?
IVW and VTI share 139 common holdings with a 57.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2797 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVW or VTI?
IVW yields 0.37% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.