JHLN vs VOO
John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JHLN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $640M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.90% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 196 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.08% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.31% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 20, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
JHLN vs VOO Performance
John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF (JHLN) is a ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JHLN returned +3.31% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, JHLN is up 2.08% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 2.4% for JHLN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.5% for JHLN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JHLN charges 0.62% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JHLN currently yields 4.90% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
JHLN and VOO share 0 holdings out of 629 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JHLN or VOO?
JHLN has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JHLN or VOO?
Over the past year JHLN returned +3.31% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), JHLN annualized +3.30% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JHLN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 2.4% for JHLN. Worst drawdown: JHLN -1.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both JHLN and VOO?
JHLN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JHLN and VOO?
JHLN and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 629 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JHLN or VOO?
JHLN yields 4.90% while VOO yields 1.08%, so JHLN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.