JPFP vs VTI
JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, JPFP or VTI?
Managed Futures against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JPFP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $33M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 597 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +6.27% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +18.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Managed Futures | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 27, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
JPFP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JPFP vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, JPFP is up 6.27% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JPFP charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JPFP currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 69.4% of VTI's money is in holdings JPFP also owns.
Stated as a floor: for JPFP, our book for it covers 66.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
343 positions in common, counted across the 403 positions we hold weights for in JPFP and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 597 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JPFP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.84% | 6.40% | 1.56% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.10% | 6.29% | 2.19% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.31% | 4.79% | 1.48% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.72% | 2.90% | 0.18% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.19% | 2.31% | 0.12% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.81% | 2.56% | 0.75% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.70% | 1.70% | 0.00% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.21% | 1.28% | 0.07% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.88% | 1.29% | 0.41% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 0.58% | 1.35% | 0.77% |
69.4% of VTI is already inside JPFP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JPFP or VTI?
JPFP has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between JPFP and VTI?
At least 69.4% of VTI's money is in holdings JPFP also owns. Our book for JPFP is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 343 positions in common, counted across the 403 positions we hold weights for in JPFP and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, JPFP or VTI?
JPFP yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than JPFP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.