JPFP vs VTI
JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, JPFP or VTI?
Managed Futures against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JPFP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 597 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +3.22% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.81% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Managed Futures | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 27, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
JPFP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JPFP vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, JPFP is up 3.22% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JPFP charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JPFP currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 403 holdings in JPFP and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 66.9% and 92.3% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 323 positions appear in both.
323 positions in common, counted across the 403 positions we hold weights for in JPFP and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 597 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JPFP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 4.84% | 6.32% | 1.48% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.10% | 5.84% | 1.74% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 3.31% | 3.81% | 0.50% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 2.72% | 2.88% | 0.16% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.19% | 2.27% | 0.08% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.81% | 2.46% | 0.65% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 1.70% | 1.70% | 0.00% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.88% | 1.79% | 0.91% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.21% | 1.24% | 0.03% |
| TSLATesla Motors Inc | 0.58% | 1.63% | 1.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JPFP and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JPFP or VTI?
JPFP has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, JPFP or VTI?
JPFP yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than JPFP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.