KBUF vs VOO
KBUF vs VOO
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KBUF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.92% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -11.45% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -5.26% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 8, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
KBUF vs VOO Performance
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KBUF returned -5.26% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, KBUF is down 11.45% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.7% for KBUF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.1% for KBUF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.12. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KBUF charges 1.01% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $101 vs $3 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KBUF currently yields 8.92% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
KBUF and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KBUF or VOO?
KBUF has an expense ratio of 1.01% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $98 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KBUF or VOO?
Over the past year KBUF returned -5.26% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), KBUF annualized +9.25% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KBUF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.7% for KBUF. Worst drawdown: KBUF -21.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KBUF and VOO?
KBUF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.12, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KBUF and VOO?
KBUF and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KBUF or VOO?
KBUF yields 8.92% while VOO yields 1.09%, so KBUF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.