LGCF vs VXUS
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGCF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 148 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +12.15% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.82% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
LGCF vs VXUS Performance
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) is a ETF from Themes ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LGCF returned +22.82% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, LGCF is up 12.15% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.1% for LGCF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for LGCF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGCF charges 0.29% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $5 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGCF currently yields 1.76% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
LGCF and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7937 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGCF or VXUS?
LGCF has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LGCF or VXUS?
Over the past year LGCF returned +22.82% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LGCF annualized +18.88% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LGCF or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.1% for LGCF. Worst drawdown: LGCF -16.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both LGCF and VXUS?
LGCF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LGCF and VXUS?
LGCF and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7937 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGCF or VXUS?
LGCF yields 1.76% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.