LGCF vs VTI
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LGCF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGCF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 77 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.46% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.39% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
LGCF vs VTI Performance
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) is a ETF from Themes ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LGCF returned +22.39% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, LGCF is up 14.46% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.2% for LGCF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for LGCF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGCF charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGCF currently yields 1.67% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LGCF and VTI share 71 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGCF or VTI?
LGCF has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LGCF or VTI?
Over the past year LGCF returned +22.39% vs +22.35% for VTI, so LGCF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LGCF annualized +19.56% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LGCF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.2% for LGCF. Worst drawdown: LGCF -16.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LGCF and VTI?
LGCF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LGCF and VTI?
LGCF and VTI share 71 common holdings with a 8.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGCF or VTI?
LGCF yields 1.67% while VTI yields 1.07%, so LGCF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.