LGCF vs VOO
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LGCF or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LGCF led over 1Y, VOO over the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGCF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 77 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +13.35%Best | +11.55% |
| 1Y Return | +18.91%Best | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.1%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $15,890 | $16,556Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.5% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2023 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.7 years).
LGCF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
LGCF vs VOO Performance
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) is an ETF from Themes ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LGCF returned +18.91% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, LGCF is up 13.35% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 10.1% for LGCF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for LGCF and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGCF charges 0.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGCF currently yields 1.67% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
94.9% of LGCF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.2% of VOO's money is in holdings LGCF also owns.
Most of LGCF is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 64 days apart, LGCF as of Sep 2, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
68 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in LGCF and 505 in VOO, against full books of 77 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 429 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for LGCF (90.3% of the fund), and 6 for LGCF that do not appear in VOO (4.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LGCF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 5.45% | 0.88% | 4.57% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 5.79% | 0.48% | 5.31% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 4.94% | 1.26% | 3.68% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.71% | 0.69% | 4.02% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc. | 4.51% | 0.44% | 4.07% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 3.36% | 0.24% | 3.12% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.28% | 0.30% | 2.98% |
| AXPAmerican Express Co. | 3.23% | 0.28% | 2.95% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 2.75% | 0.23% | 2.52% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.49% | 0.18% | 2.31% |
94.9% of LGCF is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGCF or VOO?
LGCF has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LGCF or VOO?
Over the past year LGCF returned +18.91% vs +17.54% for VOO, so LGCF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LGCF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 10.1% for LGCF. Worst drawdown: LGCF -16.7% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both LGCF and VOO?
LGCF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LGCF and VOO?
94.9% of LGCF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.2% of VOO's is in holdings LGCF also owns. They hold 68 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in LGCF and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGCF or VOO?
LGCF yields 1.67% while VOO yields 1.04%, so LGCF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LGCF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LGCF led over 1Y, VOO over the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.