LGCF vs VOO
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LGCF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGCF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 77 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.70% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.50% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LGCF vs VOO Performance
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) is a ETF from Themes ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LGCF returned +21.50% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, LGCF is up 13.70% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 10.2% for LGCF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for LGCF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGCF charges 0.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGCF currently yields 1.67% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LGCF and VOO share 69 holdings out of 512 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGCF or VOO?
LGCF has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LGCF or VOO?
Over the past year LGCF returned +21.50% vs +20.92% for VOO, so LGCF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LGCF annualized +19.28% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LGCF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 10.2% for LGCF. Worst drawdown: LGCF -16.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LGCF and VOO?
LGCF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LGCF and VOO?
LGCF and VOO share 69 common holdings with a 9.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGCF or VOO?
LGCF yields 1.67% while VOO yields 1.08%, so LGCF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.