LGCF vs VYM
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGCF | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 77 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +14.49% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.11% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
LGCF vs VYM Performance
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) is a ETF from Themes ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LGCF returned +23.11% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, LGCF is up 14.49% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 10.2% for LGCF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for LGCF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGCF charges 0.29% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $4 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGCF currently yields 1.67% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
LGCF and VYM share 53 holdings out of 626 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGCF or VYM?
LGCF has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LGCF or VYM?
Over the past year LGCF returned +23.11% vs +23.48% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LGCF annualized +19.61% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LGCF or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 10.2% for LGCF. Worst drawdown: LGCF -16.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both LGCF and VYM?
LGCF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LGCF and VYM?
LGCF and VYM share 53 common holdings with a 21.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 626 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGCF or VYM?
LGCF yields 1.67% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.