LGCF vs VYM
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, LGCF or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. LGCF led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGCF | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 77 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +13.35%Best | +13.15% |
| 1Y Return | +18.91%Best | +17.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.99% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.1%Tie | 10.1%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $15,890Best | $15,677 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.5% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2023 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.7 years).
LGCF vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
LGCF vs VYM Performance
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) is an ETF from Themes ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LGCF returned +18.91% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, LGCF is up 13.35% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LGCF and VYM have been equally volatile, both at 10.1% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for LGCF and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGCF charges 0.29% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $4 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGCF currently yields 1.67% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
78.8% of LGCF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 21.1% of VYM's money is in holdings LGCF also owns.
Most of LGCF is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 64 days apart, LGCF as of Sep 2, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
52 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in LGCF and 603 in VYM, against full books of 77 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 517 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for LGCF (76.5% of the fund), and 22 for LGCF that do not appear in VYM (20.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LGCF | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 4.94% | 3.38% | 1.56% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 5.45% | 2.36% | 3.09% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 5.79% | 1.28% | 4.51% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.71% | 1.85% | 2.86% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc. | 4.51% | 1.15% | 3.36% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.28% | 0.81% | 2.47% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 3.36% | 0.65% | 2.71% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.49% | 0.49% | 2.00% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 2.42% | 0.52% | 1.90% |
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 2.47% | 0.41% | 2.06% |
78.8% of LGCF is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGCF or VYM?
LGCF has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LGCF or VYM?
Over the past year LGCF returned +18.91% vs +17.82% for VYM, so LGCF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LGCF or VYM?
LGCF and VYM have been equally volatile, both at 10.1% annualized. Worst drawdown: LGCF -16.7% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both LGCF and VYM?
LGCF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LGCF and VYM?
78.8% of LGCF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 21.1% of VYM's is in holdings LGCF also owns. They hold 52 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in LGCF and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGCF or VYM?
LGCF yields 1.67% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than LGCF?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. LGCF led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.