IVV vs LGCF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. LGCF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LGCF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.29% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.67% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 77 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +14.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Themes ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 13, 2023 |
IVV vs LGCF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) is a ETF from Themes ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while LGCF returned +22.39%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 14.46% for LGCF.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.2% for LGCF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.7% for LGCF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LGCF charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $29 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.67% for LGCF.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LGCF share 69 holdings out of 512 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LGCF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LGCF charges 0.29%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LGCF?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +22.39% for LGCF, so LGCF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +19.56% for LGCF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LGCF?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.2% for LGCF. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LGCF -16.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and LGCF?
IVV and LGCF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LGCF?
IVV and LGCF share 69 common holdings with a 9.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LGCF?
IVV yields 1.10% while LGCF yields 1.67%, so LGCF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.