LQAI vs VXUS
LG QRAFT AI-Powered US Large Cap Core ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LQAI | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.87% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +17.30% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.33% | +26.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
LQAI vs VXUS Performance
LG QRAFT AI-Powered US Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) is a ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LQAI returned +20.33% while VXUS returned +26.87%. Year to date, LQAI is up 17.30% versus a gain of 15.00% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LQAI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.2% for LQAI and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LQAI charges 0.75% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $5 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LQAI currently yields 0.87% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
LQAI and VXUS share 6 holdings out of 7955 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LQAI or VXUS?
LQAI has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LQAI or VXUS?
Over the past year LQAI returned +20.33% vs +26.87% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LQAI annualized +25.12% vs +4.88% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LQAI or VXUS?
LQAI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: LQAI -21.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both LQAI and VXUS?
LQAI and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LQAI and VXUS?
LQAI and VXUS share 6 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7955 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LQAI or VXUS?
LQAI yields 0.87% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.