IVV vs LQAI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs LG QRAFT AI-Powered US Large Cap Core ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. LQAI delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LQAI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.95% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 101 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +17.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +23.95% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -21.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | QRAFT AI ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 7, 2023 |
IVV vs LQAI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and LG QRAFT AI-Powered US Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) is a ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while LQAI returned +23.95%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 17.85% for LQAI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LQAI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -21.2% for LQAI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LQAI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.95% for LQAI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LQAI share 76 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 31.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LQAI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LQAI charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LQAI?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +23.95% for LQAI, so LQAI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +25.09% for LQAI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LQAI?
LQAI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LQAI -21.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and LQAI?
IVV and LQAI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LQAI?
IVV and LQAI share 76 common holdings with a 31.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LQAI?
IVV yields 1.10% while LQAI yields 0.95%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.