IVV vs LQAI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs LG QRAFT AI-Powered US Large Cap Core ETF
Which is better, IVV or LQAI?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, LQAI over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LQAI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.92% |
| Holdings | 508 | 101 |
| YTD Return | +11.51% | +16.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.96%Best | +15.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.01% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.66% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 15.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -21.2% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $18,142 | $18,552Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 44.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | QRAFT AI ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 7, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2023 to Sep 15, 2026 (2.9 years).
IVV vs LQAI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs LQAI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and LG QRAFT AI-Powered US Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) is an ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +15.96% while LQAI returned +15.44%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.51% versus a gain of 16.06% for LQAI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LQAI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 11.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -21.2% for LQAI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LQAI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.92% for LQAI.
Holdings Overlap
51.5% of IVV's money is in holdings LQAI also owns. 85.1% of LQAI's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of LQAI is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
79 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 99 in LQAI, against full books of 508 and 101.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 11 positions for LQAI that do not appear in our book for IVV (4.9% of the fund), and 402 for IVV that do not appear in LQAI (47.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in LQAI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 5.45% | 2.62% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 5.35% | 0.34% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 3.87% | 3.15% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 5.26% | 1.42% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 6.19% | 4.56% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 4.54% | 3.38% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 4.05% | 2.49% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 3.32% | 1.42% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.35% | 3.67% | 3.32% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 0.50% | 2.50% |
85.1% of LQAI is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LQAI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LQAI charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or LQAI?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.96% vs +15.44% for LQAI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or LQAI?
LQAI has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 11.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs LQAI -21.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and LQAI?
IVV and LQAI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LQAI?
85.1% of LQAI's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 85.1% of LQAI's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 79 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 99 in LQAI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LQAI?
IVV yields 1.06% while LQAI yields 0.92%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LQAI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, LQAI over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.