LQAI vs VYM
LG QRAFT AI-Powered US Large Cap Core ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, LQAI or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. LQAI led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LQAI | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 101 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +16.88%Best | +13.08% |
| 1Y Return | +16.25% | +17.46%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.73% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.22% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 10.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.2% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $18,695Best | $17,108 |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.9% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2023 to Sep 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
LQAI vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
LQAI vs VYM Performance
LG QRAFT AI-Powered US Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) is an ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LQAI returned +16.25% while VYM returned +17.46%. Year to date, LQAI is up 16.88% versus a gain of 13.08% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LQAI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 10.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.2% for LQAI and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LQAI charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LQAI currently yields 0.92% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
32.3% of LQAI's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 30.0% of VYM's money is in holdings LQAI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
44 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in LQAI and 557 in VYM, against full books of 101 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 484 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for LQAI (67.0% of the fund), and 47 for LQAI that do not appear in VYM (57.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LQAI | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.50% | 7.35% | 6.85% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 0.27% | 2.63% | 2.36% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.16% | 2.51% | 2.35% |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 1.84% | 0.58% | 1.26% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 1.78% | 0.25% | 1.53% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.12% | 1.86% | 1.74% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.13% | 1.80% | 1.67% |
| KVUEKenvue Inc | 1.77% | 0.15% | 1.62% |
| PPLPpl Corp (Utilities) | 1.78% | 0.11% | 1.67% |
| FFord Motor Credit | 1.66% | 0.23% | 1.43% |
32.3% of LQAI is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LQAI or VYM?
LQAI has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LQAI or VYM?
Over the past year LQAI returned +16.25% vs +17.46% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LQAI or VYM?
LQAI has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 10.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: LQAI -21.2% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both LQAI and VYM?
LQAI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LQAI and VYM?
32.3% of LQAI's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 30.0% of VYM's is in holdings LQAI also owns. They hold 44 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in LQAI and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, LQAI or VYM?
LQAI yields 0.92% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than LQAI?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. LQAI led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.