LQAI vs VYM
LG QRAFT AI-Powered US Large Cap Core ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LQAI | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +20.87% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.05% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
LQAI vs VYM Performance
LG QRAFT AI-Powered US Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) is a ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LQAI returned +24.05% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, LQAI is up 20.87% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LQAI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.2% for LQAI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LQAI charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LQAI currently yields 0.95% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
LQAI and VYM share 39 holdings out of 655 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LQAI or VYM?
LQAI has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LQAI or VYM?
Over the past year LQAI returned +24.05% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), LQAI annualized +26.43% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LQAI or VYM?
LQAI has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: LQAI -21.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both LQAI and VYM?
LQAI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LQAI and VYM?
LQAI and VYM share 39 common holdings with a 11.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 655 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LQAI or VYM?
LQAI yields 0.95% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.