LQAI vs VOO
LG QRAFT AI-Powered US Large Cap Core ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LQAI or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LQAI led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LQAI | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 201 | 519 |
| YTD Return | +13.52%Best | +10.69% |
| 1Y Return | +9.60% | +11.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.26%Best | +21.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.65% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.2% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $17,945Best | $17,817 |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.6% | 39.1%Best |
| Fund Family | QRAFT AI ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2023 to Nov 10, 2026 (3 years).
LQAI vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
LQAI vs VOO Performance
LG QRAFT AI-Powered US Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) is an ETF from QRAFT AI ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LQAI returned +9.60% while VOO returned +11.33%. Year to date, LQAI is up 13.52% versus a gain of 10.69% for VOO.
Over three years, LQAI compounded at +21.26% per year against +21.04% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LQAI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.2% for LQAI and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LQAI charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LQAI currently yields 0.90% against 1.05% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
81.5% of LQAI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 55.9% of VOO's money is in holdings LQAI also owns.
Most of LQAI is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
82 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in LQAI and 506 in VOO, against full books of 201 and 519.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 419 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for LQAI (44.1% of the fund), and 8 for LQAI that do not appear in VOO (8.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LQAI | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.30% | 8.39% | 4.09% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 4.01% | 7.38% | 3.37% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.82% | 5.78% | 1.96% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.11% | 2.43% | 2.68% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.14% | 1.83% | 2.31% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.08% | 1.52% | 2.56% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.96% | 1.52% | 1.44% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.43% | 3.71% | 3.28% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 3.61% | 0.39% | 3.22% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 0.44% | 3.07% | 2.63% |
81.5% of LQAI is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LQAI or VOO?
LQAI has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LQAI or VOO?
Over the past year LQAI returned +9.60% vs +11.33% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LQAI or VOO?
LQAI has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LQAI -21.2% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both LQAI and VOO?
LQAI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LQAI and VOO?
81.5% of LQAI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 55.9% of VOO's is in holdings LQAI also owns. They hold 82 positions in common, counted across the 99 positions we hold weights for in LQAI and 506 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, LQAI or VOO?
LQAI yields 0.90% while VOO yields 1.05%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LQAI?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LQAI led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.