LRGG vs VXUS
Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRGG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $289M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 23 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +1.95% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.07% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 14, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
LRGG vs VXUS Performance
Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) is a ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LRGG returned +1.07% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, LRGG is up 1.95% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.8% for LRGG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.9% for LRGG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRGG charges 0.45% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $5 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGG currently yields 0.17% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
LRGG and VXUS share 2 holdings out of 7879 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRGG or VXUS?
LRGG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LRGG or VXUS?
Over the past year LRGG returned +1.07% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LRGG annualized +7.82% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LRGG or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.8% for LRGG. Worst drawdown: LRGG -18.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both LRGG and VXUS?
LRGG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LRGG and VXUS?
LRGG and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7879 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRGG or VXUS?
LRGG yields 0.17% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.