LRGG vs VOO
Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LRGG or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRGG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $293M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 21 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +1.21% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.10% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.9% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $11,706 | $14,716Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 70.2% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 14, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.3 years).
LRGG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
LRGG vs VOO Performance
Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LRGG returned +0.10% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, LRGG is up 1.21% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LRGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 11.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.9% for LRGG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRGG charges 0.44% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGG currently yields 0.15% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
89.4% of LRGG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.9% of VOO's money is in holdings LRGG also owns.
Most of LRGG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
17 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LRGG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 21 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 470 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for LRGG (69.2% of the fund), and 1 for LRGG that do not appear in VOO (0.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LRGG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 16.50% | 7.55% | 8.95% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.80% | 5.36% | 3.44% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.82% | 7.05% | 0.23% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 10.72% | 2.62% | 8.10% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.61% | 4.13% | 0.52% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.82% | 0.93% | 3.89% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 4.24% | 0.58% | 3.66% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 4.31% | 0.19% | 4.12% |
| ICEInternational Exchange, Inc. | 4.24% | 0.13% | 4.11% |
| MSIMotorola Solutions, Inc | 4.24% | 0.11% | 4.13% |
89.4% of LRGG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRGG or VOO?
LRGG has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LRGG or VOO?
Over the past year LRGG returned +0.10% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LRGG annualized +7.09% vs +18.29% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LRGG or VOO?
LRGG has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 11.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LRGG -18.9% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both LRGG and VOO?
LRGG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LRGG and VOO?
89.4% of LRGG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.9% of VOO's is in holdings LRGG also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LRGG and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRGG or VOO?
LRGG yields 0.15% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LRGG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.