IVV vs LRGG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LRGG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.45% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $289M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.17% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 23 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +2.02% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +0.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -18.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 14, 2024 |
IVV vs LRGG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) is a ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while LRGG returned +0.30%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 2.02% for LRGG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.8% for LRGG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -18.9% for LRGG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LRGG charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.17% for LRGG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LRGG share 16 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 28.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LRGG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LRGG charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LRGG?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +0.30% for LRGG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +7.80% for LRGG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LRGG?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.8% for LRGG. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LRGG -18.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and LRGG?
IVV and LRGG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LRGG?
IVV and LRGG share 16 common holdings with a 28.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LRGG?
IVV yields 1.09% while LRGG yields 0.17%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.