IVV vs LRGG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF
Which is better, IVV or LRGG?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LRGG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.44% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $293M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 508 | 21 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +1.21% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +0.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 12.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -18.9% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $14,716Best | $11,706 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 70.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 14, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.3 years).
IVV vs LRGG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs LRGG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while LRGG returned +0.10%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 1.21% for LRGG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LRGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 11.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -18.9% for LRGG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LRGG charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $44 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.15% for LRGG.
Holdings Overlap
30.3% of IVV's money is in holdings LRGG also owns. 89.4% of LRGG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of LRGG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
17 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 21 in LRGG, against full books of 508 and 21.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for LRGG that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.4% of the fund), and 465 for IVV that do not appear in LRGG (68.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in LRGG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 16.50% | 8.43% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 8.80% | 3.11% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 6.82% | 0.20% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 10.72% | 8.33% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 3.61% | 0.23% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.95% | 4.82% | 3.87% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 0.53% | 4.24% | 3.71% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 0.20% | 4.31% | 4.11% |
| ICEInternational Exchange, Inc. | 0.14% | 4.24% | 4.10% |
| MSIMotorola Solutions, Inc | 0.12% | 4.24% | 4.12% |
89.4% of LRGG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LRGG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LRGG charges 0.44%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or LRGG?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +0.10% for LRGG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +18.29% vs +7.09% for LRGG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or LRGG?
LRGG has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 11.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs LRGG -18.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and LRGG?
IVV and LRGG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LRGG?
89.4% of LRGG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 89.4% of LRGG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 21 in LRGG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LRGG?
IVV yields 1.06% while LRGG yields 0.15%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LRGG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.