LRGG vs VTI
Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LRGG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRGG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $293M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 21 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +1.21% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.10% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.9%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $11,706 | $14,596Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 70.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 14, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.3 years).
LRGG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
LRGG vs VTI Performance
Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LRGG returned +0.10% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, LRGG is up 1.21% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LRGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 12.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.9% for LRGG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRGG charges 0.44% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGG currently yields 0.15% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
92.8% of LRGG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 26.4% of VTI's money is in holdings LRGG also owns.
Most of LRGG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
18 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LRGG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 21 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,133 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for LRGG (71.1% of the fund), and 1 for LRGG that do not appear in VTI (0.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LRGG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 16.50% | 6.40% | 10.10% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.80% | 4.79% | 4.01% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.82% | 6.29% | 0.53% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 10.72% | 2.31% | 8.41% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.61% | 3.65% | 0.04% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.82% | 0.83% | 3.99% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 4.24% | 0.52% | 3.72% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 4.31% | 0.17% | 4.14% |
| ICEInternational Exchange, Inc. | 4.24% | 0.12% | 4.12% |
| MSIMotorola Solutions, Inc | 4.24% | 0.10% | 4.14% |
92.8% of LRGG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRGG or VTI?
LRGG has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LRGG or VTI?
Over the past year LRGG returned +0.10% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LRGG annualized +7.09% vs +17.87% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LRGG or VTI?
LRGG has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 12.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LRGG -18.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both LRGG and VTI?
LRGG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LRGG and VTI?
92.8% of LRGG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 26.4% of VTI's is in holdings LRGG also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LRGG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRGG or VTI?
LRGG yields 0.15% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LRGG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.