METV vs QQQ
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METV | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $214M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +2.65% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.21% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.24% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.51% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
METV vs QQQ Performance
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year METV returned +6.21% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, METV is up 2.65% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, METV compounded at +27.24% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +6.51% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 27.1% for METV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.6% for METV and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METV charges 0.58% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $18 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METV currently yields 0.18% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
METV and QQQ share 14 holdings out of 128 unique holdings combined, representing a 29.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METV or QQQ?
METV has an expense ratio of 0.58% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, METV or QQQ?
Over the past year METV returned +6.21% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), METV annualized +5.39% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, METV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 27.1% for METV. Worst drawdown: METV -59.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both METV and QQQ?
METV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between METV and QQQ?
METV and QQQ share 14 common holdings with a 29.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 128 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, METV or QQQ?
METV yields 0.18% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.