METV vs VTI
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, METV or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. METV led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $224M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 84 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +10.15% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.46% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.61%Best | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.87% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.8% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.6% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,295 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 30, 2021 to Oct 2, 2026 (5.3 years).
METV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
METV vs VTI Performance
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year METV returned +0.46% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, METV is up 10.15% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, METV compounded at +31.61% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.87% and +12.83% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.8% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.6% for METV and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METV charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METV currently yields 0.17% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
59.0% of METV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 28.4% of VTI's money is in holdings METV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, METV as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
22 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in METV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 84 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,128 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for METV (69.1% of the fund), and 2 for METV that do not appear in VTI (1.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in METV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.98% | 6.29% | 0.69% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.08% | 6.40% | 2.32% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.41% | 4.79% | 0.38% |
| RBLXRoblox Corp., Class A | 8.18% | 0.03% | 8.15% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.63% | 2.90% | 0.73% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.41% | 3.65% | 1.24% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.97% | 1.70% | 2.27% |
| UUnity Software Inc. | 4.86% | 0.02% | 4.84% |
| COINCoinbase Globa-A | 2.69% | 0.04% | 2.65% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 2.61% | 0.06% | 2.55% |
59.0% of METV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METV or VTI?
METV has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, METV or VTI?
Over the past year METV returned +0.46% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, METV or VTI?
METV has been the more volatile fund at 26.8% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: METV -59.6% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both METV and VTI?
METV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between METV and VTI?
59.0% of METV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 28.4% of VTI's is in holdings METV also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in METV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, METV or VTI?
METV yields 0.17% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than METV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. METV led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.