METV vs VOO
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $213M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.36% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.65% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.66% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.61% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.9% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
METV vs VOO Performance
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year METV returned -0.65% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, METV is up 0.36% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, METV compounded at +24.66% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.61% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +4.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.9% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.6% for METV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METV charges 0.58% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METV currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
METV and VOO share 17 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METV or VOO?
METV has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, METV or VOO?
Over the past year METV returned -0.65% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), METV annualized +4.95% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, METV or VOO?
METV has been the more volatile fund at 26.9% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: METV -59.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both METV and VOO?
METV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between METV and VOO?
METV and VOO share 17 common holdings with a 25.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, METV or VOO?
METV yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.