MFSV vs SCHD
MFS Active Value ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, MFSV or SCHD?
SCHD has been ahead.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFSV | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $599M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.32% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 64 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +7.10% | +21.73%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.64% | +26.35%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.02% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.26% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.4%Best | 13.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.7%Best | -14.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,697 | $12,225Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.6%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | MFS Investment Management | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2024 to Sep 25, 2026 (1.8 years).
MFSV vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
MFSV vs SCHD Performance
MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year MFSV returned +11.64% while SCHD returned +26.35%. Year to date, MFSV is up 7.10% versus a gain of 21.73% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 9.4% for MFSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.7% for MFSV and -14.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFSV charges 0.44% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $6 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFSV currently yields 1.32% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
10.5% of MFSV's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 24.4% of SCHD's money is in holdings MFSV also owns.
SCHD and MFSV share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in MFSV and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 64 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 92 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for MFSV (75.6% of the fund), and 52 for MFSV that do not appear in SCHD (87.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MFSV | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 2.03% | 4.69% | 2.66% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.16% | 4.02% | 1.86% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 2.00% | 3.94% | 1.94% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 1.40% | 3.88% | 2.48% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.17% | 3.83% | 2.66% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.75% | 3.13% | 2.38% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp. | 0.95% | 0.87% | 0.08% |
24.4% of SCHD is already inside MFSV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFSV or SCHD?
MFSV has an expense ratio of 0.44% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MFSV or SCHD?
Over the past year MFSV returned +11.64% vs +26.35% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MFSV annualized +9.10% vs +11.81% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MFSV or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 9.4% for MFSV. Worst drawdown: MFSV -12.7% vs SCHD -14.4%.
Should I hold both MFSV and SCHD?
MFSV and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MFSV and SCHD?
24.4% of SCHD's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 24.4% of SCHD's is in holdings MFSV also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in MFSV and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFSV or SCHD?
MFSV yields 1.32% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than MFSV?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.