MFSV vs VOO
MFS Active Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFSV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $562M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.37% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 62 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.93% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.32% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | MFS Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MFSV vs VOO Performance
MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is a ETF from MFS Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MFSV returned +21.32% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, MFSV is up 12.93% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.9% for MFSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.7% for MFSV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFSV charges 0.44% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFSV currently yields 1.37% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MFSV and VOO share 58 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFSV or VOO?
MFSV has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MFSV or VOO?
Over the past year MFSV returned +21.32% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MFSV annualized +13.32% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MFSV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.9% for MFSV. Worst drawdown: MFSV -12.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MFSV and VOO?
MFSV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MFSV and VOO?
MFSV and VOO share 58 common holdings with a 19.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFSV or VOO?
MFSV yields 1.37% while VOO yields 1.09%, so MFSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.