MFSV vs QQQ
MFS Active Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MFSV or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFSV | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $599M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.32% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 64 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +8.23% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.33% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.2%Best | 19.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.7%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,840 | $13,991Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.6%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | MFS Investment Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.8 years).
MFSV vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
MFSV vs QQQ Performance
MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MFSV returned +12.33% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, MFSV is up 8.23% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 9.2% for MFSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.7% for MFSV and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFSV charges 0.44% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $18 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFSV currently yields 1.32% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
24.4% of MFSV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 25.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings MFSV also owns.
QQQ and MFSV share little of their money.
13 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in MFSV and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 64 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 83 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for MFSV (71.7% of the fund), and 46 for MFSV that do not appear in QQQ (73.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MFSV | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.29% | 5.76% | 0.47% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.93% | 7.27% | 4.34% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.40% | 4.67% | 0.73% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 0.79% | 3.36% | 2.57% |
| KLACKla Corp | 1.59% | 1.11% | 0.48% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1.85% | 0.81% | 1.04% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.75% | 1.12% | 0.37% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 1.30% | 0.26% | 1.04% |
| PCARPaccar Inc. | 1.23% | 0.31% | 0.92% |
| XELXcel Energy Inc. | 1.10% | 0.21% | 0.89% |
25.9% of QQQ is already inside MFSV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFSV or QQQ?
MFSV has an expense ratio of 0.44% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MFSV or QQQ?
Over the past year MFSV returned +12.33% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MFSV annualized +9.84% vs +20.51% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MFSV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 9.2% for MFSV. Worst drawdown: MFSV -12.7% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both MFSV and QQQ?
MFSV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MFSV and QQQ?
25.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 25.9% of QQQ's is in holdings MFSV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in MFSV and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFSV or QQQ?
MFSV yields 1.32% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so MFSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MFSV?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.