MFSV vs VTI
MFS Active Value ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFSV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $562M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.37% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 62 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.90% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.01% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | MFS Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
MFSV vs VTI Performance
MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is a ETF from MFS Investment Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MFSV returned +20.01% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, MFSV is up 12.90% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 8.9% for MFSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.7% for MFSV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFSV charges 0.44% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFSV currently yields 1.37% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MFSV and VTI share 60 holdings out of 2786 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFSV or VTI?
MFSV has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MFSV or VTI?
Over the past year MFSV returned +20.01% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MFSV annualized +13.27% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MFSV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 8.9% for MFSV. Worst drawdown: MFSV -12.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MFSV and VTI?
MFSV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MFSV and VTI?
MFSV and VTI share 60 common holdings with a 17.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2786 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFSV or VTI?
MFSV yields 1.37% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MFSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.