MOTG vs QQQ
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOTG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $18M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.37% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 78 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +4.24% | +16.30% | |
| 1Y Return | -7.32% | +24.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.48% | +25.48% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.79% | +14.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
MOTG vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) is a ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MOTG returned -7.32% while QQQ returned +24.83%. Year to date, MOTG is up 4.24% versus a gain of 16.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, MOTG compounded at +9.48% per year against +25.48% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +3.79% and +14.50% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.01% annualized vs +9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.8% for MOTG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.8% for MOTG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOTG charges 0.52% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $18 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOTG currently yields 2.37% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
MOTG and QQQ share 10 holdings out of 164 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOTG or QQQ?
MOTG has an expense ratio of 0.52% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MOTG or QQQ?
Over the past year MOTG returned -7.32% vs +24.83% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), MOTG annualized +9.35% vs +13.01% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MOTG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.8% for MOTG. Worst drawdown: MOTG -31.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MOTG and QQQ?
MOTG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MOTG and QQQ?
MOTG and QQQ share 10 common holdings with a 9.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 164 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOTG or QQQ?
MOTG yields 2.37% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so MOTG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.