MOTG vs VOO
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, MOTG or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. MOTG is less concentrated, with 21.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOTG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $18M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 146 | 506 |
| YTD Return | -0.23% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | -13.96% | +16.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.24% | +23.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.70% | +14.02%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 16.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -31.8%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,992 | $19,271Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.8%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 31, 2018 to Oct 2, 2026 (7.9 years).
MOTG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
MOTG vs VOO Performance
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MOTG returned -13.96% while VOO returned +16.33%. Year to date, MOTG is down 0.23% versus a gain of 13.59% for VOO.
Over three years, MOTG compounded at +10.24% per year against +23.81% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.70% and +14.02% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.27% annualized vs +8.63%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MOTG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 16.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.8% for MOTG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOTG charges 0.52% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $3 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOTG currently yields 2.28% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
35.5% of MOTG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 19.9% of VOO's money is in holdings MOTG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, MOTG as of Sep 15, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
23 positions in common, counted across the 72 positions we hold weights for in MOTG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 146 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 464 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for MOTG (79.3% of the fund), and 4 for MOTG that do not appear in VOO (4.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MOTG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.15% | 7.55% | 5.40% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.35% | 5.36% | 3.01% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.87% | 2.86% | 0.99% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.05% | 1.90% | 0.15% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 2.29% | 0.27% | 2.02% |
| USBUS Bancorp | 2.27% | 0.15% | 2.12% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.16% | 0.21% | 1.95% |
| DHRDanaher Corporation | 2.03% | 0.19% | 1.84% |
| ELEstee Lauder Cos., Inc. | 2.11% | 0.03% | 2.08% |
| ZBHZimmer Biomet Holdings | 2.01% | 0.03% | 1.98% |
35.5% of MOTG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOTG or VOO?
MOTG has an expense ratio of 0.52% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MOTG or VOO?
Over the past year MOTG returned -13.96% vs +16.33% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), MOTG annualized +8.63% vs +15.27% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MOTG or VOO?
MOTG has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 16.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: MOTG -31.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MOTG and VOO?
MOTG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MOTG and VOO?
35.5% of MOTG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 19.9% of VOO's is in holdings MOTG also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 72 positions we hold weights for in MOTG and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOTG or VOO?
MOTG yields 2.28% while VOO yields 1.04%, so MOTG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than MOTG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. MOTG is less concentrated, with 21.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.