MPLY vs QQQ
Strategy Shares Monopoly ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MPLY or QQQ?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MPLY | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $18M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 200 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +10.97% | +22.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.03% | +22.84%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +27.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2%Best | 18.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.6% | -12.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,328 | $14,449Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 64.2% | 47.2%Best |
| Fund Family | STRATEGY SHARES | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 16, 2025 to Oct 8, 2026 (1.4 years).
MPLY vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
MPLY vs QQQ Performance
Strategy Shares Monopoly ETF (MPLY) is an ETF from STRATEGY SHARES and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MPLY returned +12.03% while QQQ returned +22.84%. Year to date, MPLY is up 10.97% versus a gain of 22.35% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 16.2% for MPLY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.6% for MPLY and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MPLY charges 0.79% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $18 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MPLY currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
74.3% of MPLY's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 66.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings MPLY also owns.
Most of MPLY is already inside QQQ. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
38 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in MPLY and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 200 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 58 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for MPLY (31.7% of the fund), and 59 for MPLY that do not appear in QQQ (18.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MPLY | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.51% | 8.45% | 2.06% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.15% | 7.80% | 1.35% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.22% | 5.88% | 2.34% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 9.11% | 2.93% | 6.18% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.15% | 4.41% | 1.74% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.87% | 3.07% | 0.80% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.89% | 2.74% | 1.15% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.43% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies | 4.81% | 1.28% | 3.53% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.06% | 3.71% | 1.65% |
74.3% of MPLY is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MPLY or QQQ?
MPLY has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MPLY or QQQ?
Over the past year MPLY returned +12.03% vs +22.84% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MPLY annualized +22.78% vs +30.07% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MPLY or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 16.2% for MPLY. Worst drawdown: MPLY -13.6% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both MPLY and QQQ?
MPLY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MPLY and QQQ?
74.3% of MPLY's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 66.0% of QQQ's is in holdings MPLY also owns. They hold 38 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in MPLY and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, MPLY or QQQ?
MPLY yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MPLY?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.