NANC vs VXUS
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NANC | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $273M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 103 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +14.36% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.37% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.23% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Subversive Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 7, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NANC vs VXUS Performance
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) is a ETF from Subversive Capital and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NANC returned +23.37% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, NANC is up 14.36% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, NANC compounded at +23.23% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, NANC has the edge at +22.76% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.8% for NANC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for NANC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NANC charges 0.72% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $5 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NANC currently yields 0.18% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
NANC and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7966 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NANC or VXUS?
NANC has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NANC or VXUS?
Over the past year NANC returned +23.37% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NANC annualized +22.76% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NANC or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.8% for NANC. Worst drawdown: NANC -20.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NANC and VXUS?
NANC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NANC and VXUS?
NANC and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7966 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NANC or VXUS?
NANC yields 0.18% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.