NANC vs SCHD
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. NANC offers more diversification with 105 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NANC | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $273M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 103 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +15.54% | +26.21% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.23% | +29.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.79% | +15.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Subversive Capital | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 7, 2023 | Oct 20, 2011 |
NANC vs SCHD Performance
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) is a ETF from Subversive Capital and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year NANC returned +21.23% while SCHD returned +29.99%. Year to date, NANC is up 15.54% versus a gain of 26.21% for SCHD.
Over three years, NANC compounded at +23.79% per year against +15.73% for SCHD. Across the full 4-year window we track, NANC has the edge at +23.00% annualized vs +11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NANC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for NANC and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NANC charges 0.72% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $6 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NANC currently yields 0.18% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
NANC and SCHD share 10 holdings out of 195 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NANC or SCHD?
NANC has an expense ratio of 0.72% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NANC or SCHD?
Over the past year NANC returned +21.23% vs +29.99% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NANC annualized +23.00% vs +11.50% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NANC or SCHD?
NANC has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: NANC -20.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both NANC and SCHD?
NANC and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NANC and SCHD?
NANC and SCHD share 10 common holdings with a 3.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 195 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NANC or SCHD?
NANC yields 0.18% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.