NANC vs QQQ
Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NANC | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $293M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.19% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +14.84% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.50% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.95% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Subversive Capital | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 7, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
NANC vs QQQ Performance
Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF (NANC) is a ETF from Subversive Capital and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NANC returned +20.50% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, NANC is up 14.84% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, NANC compounded at +23.95% per year against +26.64% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, NANC has the edge at +22.76% annualized vs +13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.8% for NANC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for NANC and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NANC charges 0.72% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $18 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NANC currently yields 0.19% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
NANC and QQQ share 28 holdings out of 179 unique holdings combined, representing a 44.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NANC or QQQ?
NANC has an expense ratio of 0.72% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NANC or QQQ?
Over the past year NANC returned +20.50% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NANC annualized +22.76% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NANC or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.8% for NANC. Worst drawdown: NANC -20.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both NANC and QQQ?
NANC and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between NANC and QQQ?
NANC and QQQ share 28 common holdings with a 44.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 179 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NANC or QQQ?
NANC yields 0.19% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.