NANC vs VTI
Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NANC or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NANC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NANC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $285M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 106 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +15.62%Best | +13.60% |
| 1Y Return | +19.28%Best | +18.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.92%Best | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $20,581Best | $18,956 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Subversive Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 7, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 7, 2023 to Sep 25, 2026 (3.6 years).
NANC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.
NANC vs VTI Performance
Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF (NANC) is an ETF from Subversive Capital and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NANC returned +19.28% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, NANC is up 15.62% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, NANC compounded at +25.92% per year against +23.04% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, NANC has the edge at +22.20% annualized vs +19.44%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NANC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for NANC and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NANC charges 0.72% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NANC currently yields 0.18% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.5% of NANC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 50.3% of VTI's money is in holdings NANC also owns.
Most of NANC is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
85 positions in common, counted across the 90 positions we hold weights for in NANC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 106 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,068 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for NANC (47.2% of the fund), and 3 for NANC that do not appear in VTI (1.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NANC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.74% | 6.40% | 2.34% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.62% | 4.79% | 1.83% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.44% | 6.29% | 1.85% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.94% | 3.65% | 1.29% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 5.85% | 2.31% | 3.54% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 3.84% | 0.56% | 3.28% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.54% | 1.35% | 1.19% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 3.60% | 0.26% | 3.34% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.40% | 1.29% | 1.11% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.98% | 1.70% | 0.28% |
97.5% of NANC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NANC or VTI?
NANC has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NANC or VTI?
Over the past year NANC returned +19.28% vs +18.17% for VTI, so NANC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NANC annualized +22.20% vs +19.44% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NANC or VTI?
NANC has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NANC -20.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both NANC and VTI?
NANC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NANC and VTI?
97.5% of NANC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 50.3% of VTI's is in holdings NANC also owns. They hold 85 positions in common, counted across the 90 positions we hold weights for in NANC and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, NANC or VTI?
NANC yields 0.18% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NANC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NANC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.