NANC vs VOO
Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NANC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $293M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.19% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 106 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.14% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.03% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.24% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Subversive Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 7, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
NANC vs VOO Performance
Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF (NANC) is a ETF from Subversive Capital and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NANC returned +19.03% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, NANC is up 12.14% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, NANC compounded at +23.24% per year against +21.79% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, NANC has the edge at +21.82% annualized vs +13.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NANC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for NANC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NANC charges 0.72% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NANC currently yields 0.19% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
NANC and VOO share 86 holdings out of 524 unique holdings combined, representing a 48.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NANC or VOO?
NANC has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NANC or VOO?
Over the past year NANC returned +19.03% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NANC annualized +21.82% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NANC or VOO?
NANC has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: NANC -20.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both NANC and VOO?
NANC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between NANC and VOO?
NANC and VOO share 86 common holdings with a 48.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 524 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NANC or VOO?
NANC yields 0.19% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.