NANC vs VYM
Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, NANC or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NANC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NANC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $285M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 106 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +13.07%Best | +11.35% |
| 1Y Return | +15.42%Best | +15.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.17%Best | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 11.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $20,201Best | $15,861 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Subversive Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 7, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 7, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.6 years).
NANC vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.
NANC vs VYM Performance
Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF (NANC) is an ETF from Subversive Capital and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NANC returned +15.42% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, NANC is up 13.07% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, NANC compounded at +23.17% per year against +17.22% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, NANC has the edge at +21.57% annualized vs +13.67%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NANC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 11.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for NANC and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NANC charges 0.72% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $4 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NANC currently yields 0.18% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
19.6% of NANC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 37.7% of VYM's money is in holdings NANC also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
33 positions in common, counted across the 90 positions we hold weights for in NANC and 557 in VYM, against full books of 106 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for NANC (59.4% of the fund), and 54 for NANC that do not appear in VYM (78.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NANC | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.10% | 7.35% | 6.25% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.01% | 1.21% | 1.80% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.23% | 3.82% | 3.59% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.51% | 2.51% | 1.00% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.40% | 1.86% | 1.46% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.82% | 1.38% | 0.56% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.30% | 1.80% | 1.50% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.24% | 1.66% | 1.42% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 1.17% | 0.69% | 0.48% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.20% | 1.50% | 1.30% |
37.7% of VYM is already inside NANC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NANC or VYM?
NANC has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $68 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NANC or VYM?
Over the past year NANC returned +15.42% vs +15.34% for VYM, so NANC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NANC annualized +21.57% vs +13.67% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NANC or VYM?
NANC has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 11.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NANC -20.9% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both NANC and VYM?
NANC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NANC and VYM?
37.7% of VYM's money is in holdings NANC also owns. 37.7% of VYM's is in holdings NANC also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 90 positions we hold weights for in NANC and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, NANC or VYM?
NANC yields 0.18% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than NANC?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NANC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.