NANR vs VYM
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, NANR or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NANR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NANR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $846M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 214 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +29.15%Best | +11.35% |
| 1Y Return | +42.66%Best | +15.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.99%Best | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.34%Best | +12.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.6% | 13.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.1% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $26,304Best | $17,861 |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.5% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2015 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 16, 2015 to Sep 18, 2026 (10.8 years).
NANR vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.8 years both funds cover.
NANR vs VYM Performance
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NANR returned +42.66% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, NANR is up 29.15% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, NANR compounded at +19.99% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +21.34% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, NANR has the edge at +13.74% annualized vs +9.84%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NANR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.6% compared with 13.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for NANR and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NANR charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NANR currently yields 1.58% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
52.6% of NANR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.6% of VYM's money is in holdings NANR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
56 positions in common, counted across the 213 positions we hold weights for in NANR and 557 in VYM, against full books of 214 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 475 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for NANR (87.5% of the fund), and 63 for NANR that do not appear in VYM (14.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NANR | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 10.08% | 2.63% | 7.45% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 6.81% | 1.48% | 5.33% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 3.97% | 0.41% | 3.56% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 2.85% | 0.60% | 2.25% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 2.17% | 0.15% | 2.02% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 1.92% | 0.38% | 1.54% |
| VLOValero Energy | 1.88% | 0.38% | 1.50% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 1.74% | 0.34% | 1.40% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 1.68% | 0.23% | 1.45% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 1.58% | 0.30% | 1.28% |
52.6% of NANR is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NANR or VYM?
NANR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NANR or VYM?
Over the past year NANR returned +42.66% vs +15.34% for VYM, so NANR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), NANR annualized +13.74% vs +9.84% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NANR or VYM?
NANR has been the more volatile fund at 23.6% annualized versus 13.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NANR -51.1% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both NANR and VYM?
NANR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NANR and VYM?
52.6% of NANR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.6% of VYM's is in holdings NANR also owns. They hold 56 positions in common, counted across the 213 positions we hold weights for in NANR and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, NANR or VYM?
NANR yields 1.58% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than NANR?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NANR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.