NANR vs VYM
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NANR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NANR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $805M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.76% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 216 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +31.83% | +14.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +49.90% | +21.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.99% | +18.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.94% | +12.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2015 | Nov 10, 2006 |
NANR vs VYM Performance
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NANR returned +49.90% while VYM returned +21.14%. Year to date, NANR is up 31.83% versus a gain of 14.95% for VYM.
Over three years, NANR compounded at +21.99% per year against +18.69% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +20.94% and +12.00% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, NANR has the edge at +14.04% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NANR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for NANR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NANR charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NANR currently yields 1.76% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
NANR and VYM share 60 holdings out of 757 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NANR or VYM?
NANR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NANR or VYM?
Over the past year NANR returned +49.90% vs +21.14% for VYM, so NANR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), NANR annualized +14.04% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NANR or VYM?
NANR has been the more volatile fund at 23.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NANR -51.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both NANR and VYM?
NANR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NANR and VYM?
NANR and VYM share 60 common holdings with a 8.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 757 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NANR or VYM?
NANR yields 1.76% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.