NANR vs VOO
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, NANR or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. NANR led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, VOO over 3Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NANR | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $846M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 214 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +31.20%Best | +11.48% |
| 1Y Return | +44.72%Best | +15.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.33% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.24%Best | +12.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.6% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.1% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $25,133Best | $18,149 |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.5% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 16, 2015 to Sep 15, 2026 (10.7 years).
NANR vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.7 years both funds cover.
NANR vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NANR returned +44.72% while VOO returned +15.94%. Year to date, NANR is up 31.20% versus a gain of 11.48% for VOO.
Over three years, NANR compounded at +20.33% per year against +21.01% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +20.24% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, NANR has the edge at +13.91% annualized vs +13.62%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NANR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.6% compared with 15.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for NANR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NANR charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NANR currently yields 1.58% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
53.4% of NANR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 3.6% of VOO's money is in holdings NANR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 213 positions we hold weights for in NANR and 494 in VOO, against full books of 214 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 457 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for NANR (95.6% of the fund), and 88 for NANR that do not appear in VOO (14.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NANR | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 10.08% | 1.00% | 9.08% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 6.81% | 0.57% | 6.24% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 3.97% | 0.16% | 3.81% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 3.13% | 0.08% | 3.05% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 2.85% | 0.23% | 2.62% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 2.17% | 0.06% | 2.11% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 1.92% | 0.14% | 1.78% |
| VLOValero Energy | 1.88% | 0.14% | 1.74% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 1.74% | 0.13% | 1.61% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 1.68% | 0.09% | 1.59% |
53.4% of NANR is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NANR or VOO?
NANR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NANR or VOO?
Over the past year NANR returned +44.72% vs +15.94% for VOO, so NANR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), NANR annualized +13.91% vs +13.62% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NANR or VOO?
NANR has been the more volatile fund at 23.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: NANR -51.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both NANR and VOO?
NANR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NANR and VOO?
53.4% of NANR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 3.6% of VOO's is in holdings NANR also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 213 positions we hold weights for in NANR and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, NANR or VOO?
NANR yields 1.58% while VOO yields 1.04%, so NANR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than NANR?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. NANR led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, VOO over 3Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.