NQLT vs PCLG
Neuberger Quality Select ETF vs Polen Focus Growth ETF
Which is better, NQLT or PCLG?
NQLT costs less.
NQLT has a lower expense ratio. NQLT is less concentrated, with 50.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NQLT | PCLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $50M | $89M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 126 | 58 |
| YTD Return | +4.01%Best | -8.53% |
| 1Y Return | - | -11.15% |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.8%Best | 63.4% |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Polen Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2026 | Sep 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
NQLT vs PCLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NQLT vs PCLG Performance
Neuberger Quality Select ETF (NQLT) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is an ETF from Polen Capital. Year to date, NQLT is up 4.01% versus a loss of 8.53% for PCLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NQLT charges 0.48% per year while PCLG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $49 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NQLT currently yields 0.00% against 0.04% for PCLG.
Holdings Overlap
35.8% of NQLT's money is in holdings PCLG also owns. 43.0% of PCLG's money is in holdings NQLT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in NQLT and 29 in PCLG, against full books of 126 and 58.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for PCLG that do not appear in our book for NQLT (52.4% of the fund), and 52 for NQLT that do not appear in PCLG (58.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NQLT | Weight in PCLG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.77% | 9.51% | 1.74% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.57% | 6.16% | 1.41% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.60% | 7.35% | 1.75% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.28% | 6.06% | 0.78% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.85% | 5.94% | 3.09% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 3.29% | 5.07% | 1.78% |
| ASL:ASAsml Holding Nv Unsponsored Adr Ordinary Shares | 2.67% | 1.10% | 1.57% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 0.79% | 1.79% | 1.00% |
43.0% of PCLG is already inside NQLT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NQLT or PCLG?
NQLT has an expense ratio of 0.48% while PCLG charges 0.49%. NQLT is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NQLT and PCLG?
43.0% of PCLG's money is in holdings NQLT also owns. 43.0% of PCLG's is in holdings NQLT also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in NQLT and 29 in PCLG.
Which pays a higher dividend, NQLT or PCLG?
NQLT yields 0.00% while PCLG yields 0.04%, so PCLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PCLG better than NQLT?
NQLT has a lower expense ratio. NQLT is less concentrated, with 50.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.