NQLT vs VTI
Neuberger Quality Select ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, NQLT or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NQLT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 63 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +1.34% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
NQLT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
NQLT vs VTI Performance
Neuberger Quality Select ETF (NQLT) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, NQLT is up 1.34% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NQLT charges 0.48% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NQLT currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 89.2% of NQLT's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of NQLT is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, NQLT as of Aug 19, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
52 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in NQLT and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 63 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NQLT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.43% | 5.84% | 0.59% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 5.80% | 6.32% | 0.52% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.90% | 3.17% | 4.73% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 7.10% | 3.81% | 3.29% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 5.35% | 2.27% | 3.08% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.64% | 2.88% | 0.76% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 4.69% | 1.11% | 3.58% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway B | 3.65% | 1.24% | 2.41% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.30% | 1.40% | 1.90% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 3.06% | 0.48% | 2.58% |
89.2% of NQLT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NQLT or VTI?
NQLT has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between NQLT and VTI?
At least 89.2% of NQLT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 52 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in NQLT and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, NQLT or VTI?
NQLT yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than NQLT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.